Articles Posted in Improving Your Practice

HealthcareImage_062618-700x525-1-e1682709849274-300x189Our healthcare law firm works with many residents and other students who are facing discipline in their programs ranging from probation to termination and non-renewal of their residency contracts. A question that comes up is what residents can do when they have been notified of disciplinary measures from their residency programs. This blog covers three considerations that residents should account for when they are notified of disciplinary measures from their programs. If you need assistance responding to a disciplinary action from your residency program or would like to discuss this blog post, you may contact our healthcare law firm at (404) 685-1662 (Atlanta) or (706) 722-7886 (Augusta), or by email, info@littlehealthlaw.com. You may also learn more about our law firm by visiting www.littlehealthlaw.com.

First Consideration: Review Your Residency Handbook and Consider Legal Representation When You Have Been Put on Probation, Not Just When You Have Been Notified That Your Contract Has Been Terminated or Has Not Been Renewed.

Barring the most egregious actions that warrant immediate termination, most residents who are disciplined are put on probation to give themselves an opportunity to improve under supervision. Once you are put on probation, you should review your Continue reading ›

iStock-1069859094-min-510x340-1-300x200Our healthcare law firm works with many providers who prescribe medications, including medications for use that is considered “off label” by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). One such off-label use is administering ketamine to patients for treatment-resistant depression. Ketamine, and the recently FDA-approved Spravato®, which has esketamine as its active ingredient, has garnered popularity as a potential treatment for treatment-resistant depression, but it has come under scrutiny in recent years. This blog covers three considerations that providers should consider before administering ketamine or Spravato® to patients. If you need assistance setting up a practice to administer ketamine or Spravato® or would like to discuss this blog post, you may contact our healthcare law firm at (404) 685-1662 (Atlanta) or (706) 722-7886 (Augusta), or by email, info@littlehealthlaw.com. You may also learn more about our law firm by visiting www.littlehealthlaw.com.

First Consideration: Ketamine and Spravato® Are Controlled Substances That Are Subject to DEA Regulations

Ketamine and Spravato® are Schedule III controlled substances that are subject to controlled substance laws and regulations under the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”). Providers who administer ketamine or Spravato® should have a DEA registration and may need a DEA registration for Continue reading ›

opioid-painkillers-crisis-and-drug-abuse-concept-o-49X49YX-e1676319930781-300x169Our healthcare law firm works with many providers who prescribe medications, including controlled substances. A question that comes up is what a provider’s reporting obligations to the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) are when they discover that controlled substances have been stolen from their office or that prescriptions for controlled substances have been fraudulently submitted to patients under their names. This blog covers two considerations that providers should account for when they are notified of theft or fraudulent prescriptions. Please note that this blog post covers reporting obligations to the DEA, not any reporting obligations to state agencies. If you need assistance reporting theft or fraudulent prescriptions to the appropriate sources or would like to discuss this blog post, you may contact our healthcare law firm at (404) 685-1662 (Atlanta) or (706) 722-7886 (Augusta), or by email, info@littlehealthlaw.com. You may also learn more about our law firm by visiting www.littlehealthlaw.com.

First Consideration: The DEA Requires Providers to Report Theft of Controlled Substances and Fraudulent Prescriptions to the DEA Within One Business Day of Discovery of the Theft or Fraudulent Prescriptions

Under the DEA regulations, a provider must notify the local DEA Field Diversion Office in writing of any theft or significant loss of any controlled substances within one business day Continue reading ›

gettyimages-1665778558-300x202

Our healthcare and business law firm works with many providers who work with compounded medications.  Recently, pharmaceutical manufacturers of weight loss drugs have brought lawsuits against compounding pharmacies and medical businesses who advertise and prescribe compounded weight loss drugs.  As against the medical businesses, the manufacturers bring claims of  false advertising and unfair trade practices for marketing and prescribing compounded semaglutide or compounded tirzepatide for weight loss. This blog covers two considerations that providers should account for when marketing or prescribing compounded semaglutide or tirzepatide for weight loss. If you need assistance responding to a lawsuit by a pharmaceutical manufacturer or would like to discuss this blog post, you may contact our healthcare and business law firm at (404) 685-1662 (Atlanta) or (706) 722-7886 (Augusta), or by email, info@littlehealthlaw.com. You may also learn more about our law firm by visiting www.littlehealthlaw.com.

Background

Semaglutide and tirzepatide are peptides that are in popular drugs, including Ozempic®, Wegovy®, Mounjaro®, and Zepbound®. The Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) originally approved Ozempic® and Mounjaro® for type-2 diabetes. These drugs gained enormous popularity as a weight-loss drug, so doctors started prescribing Ozempic® off label for weight-loss use. The FDA later approved Wegovy® and Zepbound® for weight loss. Because the popularity of these drugs soared, a drug shortage resulted. Because there was low supply and high demand, providers and pharmacies decided to sell compounded versions of semaglutide and tirzepatide. Compounded versions of drugs are not FDA-approved, so they are not subject to FDA scrutiny before they are sold on the market.

In October 2024, the FDA removed tirzepatide from the drug shortage list, and compound pharmacies filed a lawsuit, seeking to Continue reading ›

What-is-an-Opioid-e1687291586956-300x200Our healthcare and business law firm works with many providers as they undergo investigations, discipline, and/or hearings before state licensing boards. These investigations cover a variety of topics, including whether to report misconduct to a state’s licensing board. Each state’s licensing board has different reporting requirements, so ensuring compliance with the reporting requirements of each state’s licensing board can be challenging. This blog covers examples of reporting requirements in certain states as it relates to inadvertently prescribing a controlled substance to a patient who lives in a state where you are not licensed to practice. If you need assistance determining whether to report an action to a state licensing board or would like to discuss this blog post, you may contact our healthcare and business law firm at (404) 685-1662 (Atlanta) or (706) 722-7886 (Augusta), or by email, info@littlehealthlaw.com. You may also learn more about our law firm by visiting www.littlehealthlaw.com.

Consideration 1: What are the Federal reporting requirements?

The Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) has federal jurisdiction over controlled substances. Once a provider discovers a “suspicious order,” which is defined as an unusually large controlled substance order, unusually frequent controlled substance orders, or controlled substance orders that deviate substantially from a normal pattern, the provider must notify the DEA Administrator and the Special Agent in Charge of the local DEA Division Office. If a provider has had their state license registration suspended, revoked, or denied, or the state licensing board has recommended suspension, revocation, or denial of the provider’s DEA registration, the DEA can Continue reading ›

nurse-practitioner-vs-primary-care-doctor-002-e1675797661360-300x141Our healthcare and business law firm represents healthcare practitioners, including physicians and chiropractors, and their medical and chiropractic practice with compliance matters.  A question we are often asked by our clients is, “Can I offer discounts to patients?”  There are state and federal considerations before offering discounts, and this post discusses some of those considerations.  If you would like to discuss compliance considerations for your medical practice, you may contact our healthcare and business law firm at (404) 685-1662 (Atlanta) or (706) 722-7886 (Augusta), or by email, info@littlehealthlaw.com. You may also learn more about our law firm by visiting www.littlehealthlaw.com.

Consideration 1: Federal Statutes

The first consideration we’ll discuss falls under the Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”) and the Federal Beneficiary Inducements Civil Monetary Penalty Statute (“CMP”).  The AKS generally makes it a felony to give or offer anything of value, including free or otherwise discounted services or the routine waiver of coinsurance/deductibles, to induce (or in return for) the purchase or order of any good or service that is reimbursable by a Federal or state health care program (such as Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, CHIP, etc.).  Similarly, the CMP allows for the imposition of fines against Continue reading ›

MSO-Helathcare-Image-11-25-24-e1732566156791-300x191Our healthcare and business law firm works with medical practices to ensure compliance with state and federal laws, rules, and regulations.  The Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) aims to combat illicit activity including tax fraud and money laundering.  The reporting rule under the CTA requires certain entities to file beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reports.  This has raised an important question for healthcare practices structured to comply with the Corporate Practice of Medicine (CPOM) doctrine: Are members of a Management Service Organization (“MSO”) providing non-clinical services to a medical practice “beneficial owners” under the CTA?  This blog post dives into that question.  If you need assistance understanding how the reporting rule applies to your business or would like to discuss this blog post, you may contact our healthcare and business law firm at (404) 685-1662 (Atlanta) or (706) 722-7886 (Augusta), or by email, info@littlehealthlaw.com. You may also learn more about our law firm by visiting www.littlehealthlaw.com.

Understanding Beneficial Ownership Under the CTA

A “beneficial owner” is defined by the CTA as any individual who:

  1. Directly or indirectly owns 25% or more of an entity; or
  2. Exercises “substantial control” over the entity.

For most MSOs, the focus is on the “substantial control” standard.  According to the CTA, substantial control includes: Continue reading ›

HIPAA-Breaches-Healthcare-Students-e1615468812558-300x199Our healthcare and business law firm works with many medical practices to ensure compliance with the use of mid-level providers (such as nurse practitioner and physician assistants).  Although certain federal rules are applicable, the scope of practice for mid-level providers is largely provided for in state laws and rules.  It is important to remember that these laws and rules may change from time to time, so practices that use mid-level providers should always monitor relevant laws to stay apprised of any changes.  Earlier this month, changes to certain Georgia laws impacting mid-level  providers went into effect.  If you have questions about these changes or would like to discuss this blog post, you may contact our healthcare and business law firm at (404) 685-1662 (Atlanta) or (706) 722-7886 (Augusta), or by email, info@littlehealthlaw.com. You may also learn more about our law firm by visiting www.littlehealthlaw.com.

House Bill 1046 went into effect on July 1, 2024.  A copy of the bill is available here.  The bill made changes to, among other sections, Georgia Code Section 31-10-14 relating to death certificates, Georgia Code Section 43-34-23 relating to delegation of authority to nurses or physician assistants, and Georgia Code Sections 43-34-25 and 43-34-103 relating to delegation of certain medical acts to advanced practice registered nurses and physician assistants and construction and limitations of such delegation.

As to Section 31-10-14, the bill authorizes nurse practitioners and physician assistants to sign death certificates.  Previously, mid-level providers could only Continue reading ›

https://www.littlehealthlawblog.com/files/2022/10/shutterstock_588164834.1-300x200.jpgOur healthcare and business law firm works with many providers and medical practices to ensure compliance with state and federal laws, rules, and regulations for given procedures, treatments, and prescriptions.  As new treatments become popular, common questions circulate around who can and cannot order, prescribe, and/or administer such treatment.  One device that is becoming popular is the SoftWave device.  SoftWave uses ultrasound vibration to penetrate into muscles in an attempt to improve healing.  This blog post outlines three considerations prior to introducing SoftWave or similar treatments to your medical and wellness practices’ offerings.  If you need assistance understanding the full realm of considerations governing SoftWave or would like to discuss this blog post, you may contact our healthcare and business law firm at (404) 685-1662 (Atlanta) or (706) 722-7886 (Augusta), or by email, info@littlehealthlaw.com. You may also learn more about our law firm by visiting www.littlehealthlaw.com.

  1. The Food and Drug Administration Approved it for Prescription Use

The FDA has approved the SoftWave device, specifically OrthoGold 100, as a Class 1 medical device that does not need its own premarket approval because it is substantially similar to a device that’s already FDA approved (the Dermablate Effect).  The FDA only approved it for prescription use (not over the counter use).  K182682-connective-tissue.pdf (softwavetrt.com).

QuackbustersandtheShockTroopsofMedicalMcCarthyism-e1664472813118-300x181Our healthcare and business law firm guides many medical practices and physicians through employment matters.  At this point, most people are aware that the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) published its final non-compete rule (“Non-Compete Rule”) on April 23, 2024.  Our firm previously posted 3 Facts about the Non-Compete Rule, which provides information about the FTC Rule including that it limits non-competes both prospectively and retrospectively, applies to all workers with one limited exception, and that current non-compete disputes may still continue even if the Non-Compete Rule becomes effective. On August 20, 2024, a judge blocked the FTC from enforcing the Non-Compete Rule, and this post discusses that decision.  If you need assistance with employment matters or would like to discuss this blog post, you may contact our healthcare and business law firm at (404) 685-1662 (Atlanta) or (706) 722-7886 (Augusta), or by email, info@littlehealthlaw.com. You may also learn more about our law firm by visiting www.littlehealthlaw.com.

Legal Challenges

The Non-Compete Rule was set to become effective on September 4, 2024 despite many challenges.  Those challenges were Ryan, LLC v. FTC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ATS Tree Services, LLC v. FTC in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and Properties of the Villages, Inc. v. FTC in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

  • Preliminary Court Orders

On July 3, 2024, the Judge in Ryan issued a Continue reading ›

Contact Information